However, Motorola's computational photography isn't quite up to that level, and that leads to unwelcome artifacts and inconsistent blurring on the edges of my colleague Shaun's face. Some high-end devices, like the Pixel 3 and iPhone XR, can accomplish software-based bokeh without a noticeable drop in quality. Because the phone has only one rear-facing lens, the device needs to rely on software, not optics, to blur the background. The G7 Power really struggles in portraits and bokeh, however. That said, there really isn't much difference between these phones' photos, even though the Nokia 7.1 costs $100 more than the Motorola. Like other Motorola handsets of the past, the G7 Power does get a bit overzealous with the saturation Bryant Park's iconic fountain isn't quite as red as the device would lead you to believe. Inside the park, the G7 Power compares favorably against one of our favorite camera phones for the money, the Nokia 7.1. This shot of buildings hovering over New York City's Bryant Park looks pretty much identical in the two G7 models, even though the standard G7 costs $50 more. However, this isn't a terribly huge absence either, because the Moto G7's shallow depth-of-field portraits and bokeh aren't all that impressive, as is the case with many other budget phones' dual-lens systems.įor those reasons, I came away reasonably pleased with the G7 Power's performance against its more expensive sibling. What G7 Power does lack, however, is a secondary 5-MP shooter to enable depth-of-field effects. In fact, in the sub-$300 budget segment, it's actually the best camera phone we've tested. It's not quite the same as the f/1.8, 12-MP sensor in the regular G7, but in practice, the G7 Power produces images that are very, very similar. On the back of the G7 Power is one 12-megapixel camera with an f/2.0 aperture. The searing neon lights of Times Square were the perfect backdrop for the web slinger's antics, and as I shifted the device in my hand from side to side, those colors stayed remarkably consistent. I fired up Spider-Man: Into the Spider Verse and jacked the G7 Power's color profile up to Saturated to really make those juicy comic book hues pop. In those scenarios, we'd definitely rather take the Power than its siblings.Īnd truthfully, if you can see past the resolution deficit, this is still a display you'd be happy to use to watch anything. All that extra light coming through the display makes a big difference outdoors on a sunny day, when dimmer screens make reading text a struggle. At 558 nits on the max setting, this member of Motorola's midrange family totally outshone the pricier G7 and its 445 nits. However, the G7 Power really impressed in its brightness. In fact, both are nearly dead-even with the pricier Moto G7 and its showings of 135 percent and 0.34, respectively. Those are respectable numbers for a budget-priced LCD-toting smartphone. The handset covered 123 percent of the sRGB color space and notched a Delta-E accuracy score of 0.35 in our testing. Motorola might be stretching those pixels a bit wider than we'd like, but at least the G7 Power's color reproduction and brightness didn't leave much to be desired. If you can see past the resolution deficit, this is still a display you'd be happy to use to watch anything. Text and icons can't help but look a hair jagged on the G7 Power, though the farther you hold the phone away from your eyes, the less noticeable the effect. That's great for energy efficiency but not quite so good for the appearance of on-screen content. The display on this $249/£180 variant measures 1570 x 720, which translates to about 279 pixels per inch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |